An article published by Private Debt Investor on 1 July, 2026 examines the rapid growth of private credit continuation vehicles (CVs) as a liquidity solution in a market constrained by limited distributions. While supporters argue that CVs provide flexibility and can enhance returns, critics contend that they may mask weak underwriting, create valuation and governance conflicts, and face increasing pricing pressure as market conditions soften. Evan Clark, Senior Private Market Analyst at the EDHEC Infrastructure & Private Assets Research Institute (EIPA), commented:
“CVs are particularly strange in private credit; unlike private equity, these loans have a contractual term,” says Evan Clark, Senior Private Market Analyst at the EDHEC Infrastructure & Private Assets Research Institute.
(…) EDHEC’s Clark says that “valuation-related conflicts of interest are apparent in credit continuation vehicles,” whose assets may include some that have been restructured and hold equity or equity kickers, alongside payment-in-kind. “Private credit is supposed to offer a more senior, current cash paying exposure to private assets,” Clark says. “Yet, managers are increasingly reliant on the same tricks as private equity to deliver liquidity to LPs.”
📖 Read the full article on Private Debt Investor.
EIPA comments on Exposure Draft 94 to the IPSASB

Strengthening the Superannuation Performance Test: Response to the Treasury Consultation Paper of May 2026

Comments to the US Department of Labor on Proposed Rule concerning Fiduciary Duties in Selecting Designated Investment Alternatives (RIN 1210-AC38)



