Insights

A credible valuation regime, grounded in procedural clarity and technological capability, is indispensable to investor fairness, systemic resilience, and the legitimacy of private markets. A new paper from EDHEC Infra & Private Assets highlights why expanding private markets require more timely, transparent, and disciplined valuation. Since the global financial crisis, institutional investors have undertaken a structural reallocation toward private markets,

The valuations of unlisted assets anchor everything from capital-allocation and risk-management decisions and regulatory reporting. Yet, despite the principles-based guidance of IFRS 13, ASC 820, and the IPEV Guidelines, day-to-day practice remains opaque and highly discretionary. A recent paper from EDHEC Infra & Private Assets provides the first large-scale empirical portrait of those practices. Drawing on a global survey of

The EDHEC Infrastructure & Private Assets Research Institute (EIPA) has submitted detailed comments to the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Capital Markets regarding the potential inclusion of private market investments in 401(k) and other retirement vehicles. EIPA’s analysis underscores that while private equity can offer significant diversification benefits, it also introduces complex risks that require robust safeguards to protect individual

The growth in private assets Since 2012, EY estimates that private assets increased their Assets Under Management (AUM) from US$9.7 trillion to US$24.4 trillion by the end of 2023.1 This growth, has seen private managers tap different sources of capital. Starting with traditional investors such as endowments, pension funds and insurance companies, the managers have innovated, identifying permanent sources of